Segregated Funds in Canada: Guarantees, Costs, and How They Work

A segregated fund is an insurance product that invests in an underlying portfolio, similar to a mutual fund, but adds insurance guarantees, typically guaranteeing a percentage of your deposits at a maturity date or on death. Those guarantees, and the other insurance features, are paid for through fees that are generally higher than comparable mutual funds or ETFs. Whether a segregated fund is suitable depends entirely on whether its guarantees and features are worth that higher cost for your specific situation. A genuine trade-off that this page lays out in full, benefit and cost together.

What a Segregated Fund Is

A segregated fund is, at its core, an insurance contract with an investment inside it. The money you deposit is invested in an underlying portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other assets, much as a mutual fund would invest it, and the value rises and falls with those investments. What distinguishes a segregated fund from an ordinary investment fund is the layer of insurance guarantees wrapped around it, which is why segregated funds are sold by licensed insurance professionals and regulated as insurance products rather than as securities.

The honest way to understand a segregated fund is as a package deal: an investment plus a set of insurance guarantees and features, sold together, at a price that reflects both. The investment part behaves much like other funds. The insurance part, the guarantees, the potential creditor protection, the estate features, is what you pay extra for. Whether that package is right for you is the entire question, and answering it requires seeing both sides clearly, which is what the sections below are designed to do.

The Guarantees, and What They Cost

The headline feature of a segregated fund is its guarantees, so let us examine them carefully, and, just as importantly, what they cost and what conditions apply to them.

The maturity guarantee. A segregated fund typically guarantees a percentage of the amount you deposited, often 75% or 100%, payable at a maturity date, which is commonly 10 to 15 years from when you invest. If the market value at maturity is below the guaranteed amount, the insurer tops it up to the guarantee.

The cost and the conditions, in equal measure: this guarantee is not free, and it is not unconditional. You pay for it through higher fees (discussed in full below), which reduce your returns every year whether or not the guarantee is ever needed. The guarantee generally applies only if you hold the contract to the maturity date. It does not guarantee your value at all times along the way. And if you make withdrawals before maturity, the guaranteed amount is generally reduced proportionally. A 100% maturity guarantee, in other words, protects your deposits only if you stay invested for the full term and do not withdraw, and you pay for that protection continuously through fees regardless of market performance.

The death benefit guarantee. A segregated fund typically also guarantees a percentage, again often 75% or 100%, of your deposits payable to your beneficiary on the death of the person whose life the contract is based on, even if the market value has fallen below that amount.

The cost and the conditions, in equal measure: like the maturity guarantee, the death benefit guarantee is paid for through the fund's higher fees, and it is generally reduced proportionally by any withdrawals you make. The guarantee is provided by the insurer and depends on the insurer's continued financial strength; it is protected, within published limits, by Assuris in the event of insurer insolvency, but it is not a government guarantee. The benefit it provides, protecting the amount passing to your beneficiary against a market decline, is real, but you are paying for it every year through fees, and for an investor with a long horizon who would not have sold in a downturn anyway, the value of that protection has to be weighed honestly against its ongoing cost.

The Costs, In Full

Because the costs of a segregated fund are the other half of every benefit above, they deserve a section of their own rather than a footnote, and they deserve genuine prominence.

Segregated funds generally carry a higher management expense ratio (MER) than comparable mutual funds, and a substantially higher MER than typical ETFs. The MER is the annual percentage cost of owning the fund, deducted from the fund's returns. Part of the segregated fund's higher MER pays for the insurance guarantees; the difference between a segregated fund's MER and a comparable lower-cost option is, in effect, the price of those guarantees and features.

Why does this matter so much? Because fees compound against you over time, exactly as returns compound for you. A higher annual fee, sustained over many years, can reduce the final value of an investment meaningfully, and that reduction happens every year, with certainty, whereas the guarantees may never be needed if markets perform reasonably over your holding period. This is the central trade-off of a segregated fund, and an honest assessment requires weighing the certain, ongoing cost of the higher fees against the conditional, may-never-be-triggered value of the guarantees and features. For some people the guarantees and features justify the cost; for others they do not, and a lower-cost option, including ETFs or mutual funds, which we do not sell, would serve them better. There is no universal answer, only the answer that fits your situation.

Other Potential Benefits, and Their Limits

Beyond the guarantees, segregated funds offer other features, and consistent with the approach of this page, each is presented with its limits alongside it.

Potential creditor protection. Because a segregated fund is an insurance contract, it may offer potential protection from creditors in certain circumstances, particularly where a beneficiary in a protected class (such as a spouse, child, or parent, depending on the jurisdiction) is named. The limits: this protection is not absolute. It depends on the circumstances and the beneficiary designation, it can be challenged, for example, where money is moved into a segregated fund specifically to avoid known creditors, and it varies by province. It should never be assumed, and anyone relying on it should confirm its application to their specific situation with a legal professional.

Estate planning and probate bypass. With a named beneficiary, the proceeds of a segregated fund generally pass directly to that beneficiary outside the estate, which can avoid probate fees and delay in common-law provinces and provides privacy and speed. The limits: this is a feature shared with other named-beneficiary products such as life insurance, and it is not unique to segregated funds; it does not by itself justify the higher fees if estate efficiency is the only objective, since it can be achieved through lower-cost insurance products. As always, the beneficiary designation should be coordinated with the overall estate plan.

Potential reset features. Some segregated fund contracts offer reset options that can lock in market gains to a new, higher guaranteed level. The limits: reset features vary by contract, may be limited in frequency, may reset the maturity date further into the future, and add to the cost and complexity of the contract. Whether they add value depends on the specific contract terms and the investor's situation.

How Segregated Funds Are Regulated

Segregated funds are insurance products and are regulated as such, in Quebec by the AMF, and across Canada under the framework established by the Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators (CCIR) and the Canadian Insurance Services Regulatory Organisations (CISRO), including their guidance on segregated funds and on the fair treatment of customers. This regulatory framework has continued to evolve, with measures addressing matters such as sales charges and disclosure, reflecting regulators' attention to ensuring that segregated funds are sold suitably and that their costs and features are disclosed clearly. The fact that segregated funds are regulated as insurance, not securities, is also why they are sold by licensed insurance professionals rather than securities-registered advisors, and why the scope and conflict disclosure at the top of this page matters.

Who Segregated Funds May Suit

Given the trade-off at their core, segregated funds may suit certain investors and not others, and being honest about both is the point.

They may suit an investor who genuinely values the guarantees and is willing to pay for them, for example, someone close to or in retirement who wants protection against a market decline affecting a specific sum, someone who values the potential creditor protection (such as a business owner or professional, subject to confirming its application), or someone for whom the estate features and the peace of mind of the guarantees are worth the cost. For these investors, the features can be worth the higher fees.

They may not suit an investor whose primary goal is to maximize long-term returns and who has a long enough horizon and the temperament to ride out market declines without selling, because for that investor, the higher fees may simply reduce returns without the guarantees ever being needed. Such an investor might be better served by lower-cost options, including ETFs or conventional mutual funds, which we are not licensed to sell and earn no commission on. We say this plainly because you deserve to know it.

Which description fits you depends on your goals, your time horizon, your risk tolerance, your need for the specific features, and your overall financial picture. This is a suitability assessment, and it is exactly the kind of decision that should be made through a proper analysis, and, where securities are part of the comparison, in coordination with an appropriately registered professional, rather than on the basis of guarantees alone.

Book a free, no-obligation Discovery Meeting →

Frequently Asked Questions

What the insurance contract adds, and what it costs

• The guarantee is on a date, not on every dayThese contracts guarantee a percentage of what was put in, at maturity or at death, and the maturity date is written in. Between now and that date the value moves with the market like anything else. A guarantee is not a floor under the daily value.
• Naming a beneficiary changes where the money goes and how fastA contract with a named beneficiary pays that person directly, which is why it can settle in weeks rather than through the estate. In Quebec, and everywhere else, it is worth knowing what that does to the rest of the plan before naming anyone.
• The guarantees are paid for, and the fee is visibleA segregated fund generally costs more to hold than the same strategy without the contract around it, because the guarantees, the beneficiary designation and the potential creditor protection are features being bought. Whether they are worth it depends on the file, and we say so rather than assume.

Send this to a licensed advisor

No price appears on this page, and none is sent by email. What a contract costs depends on the person and the design, and no honest figure can be produced from three answers.

Continue Learning

For a side-by-side comparison, see Segregated Funds vs ETFs vs Mutual Funds, and to understand fees in depth, see Investment Fees Explained. Return to the Investment Options overview, or read our full compensation and conflict-of-interest disclosure.