Life Insurance With Diabetes in Canada

Somebody is told they have diabetes and, somewhere in the weeks that follow, they conclude quietly that life insurance is now closed to them. It is one of the most common assumptions in this business and it is usually wrong. Diabetes is among the conditions Canadian insurers see most often, they have been underwriting it for decades, and a very large number of those applications are approved. What changes is not whether coverage is available but how the file is read and what it costs. This article explains what an underwriter is actually looking at, why two insurers can return different answers on the same application, what the possible outcomes are and what each one means, and what to do next in each case. It gives no medical guidance of any kind, and it says nothing about how anybody should manage their health, which is a matter for their physician and nobody else.

The starting point: this is usually insurable

The most expensive mistake here is not applying. People assume a decline, never submit an application, and go without coverage for years while a family depends on their income. Nothing about that assumption is safe and it is frequently untrue.

Canadian insurers underwrite this condition routinely. Applications disclosing it are issued at standard rates in some cases and with a rating in many others, and the range of outcomes is wide because the range of individual files is wide. The answer for one person tells you very little about the answer for another.

What is true is that the file matters more here than in a simpler application, and that how the file is presented to the insurer matters as well. That is the practical argument for working with someone who submits these regularly rather than applying blind to whichever company advertised most recently.

What an underwriter is actually reading

An underwriter is assessing mortality risk from a whole file. The elements that generally matter are the type, the age at which it was diagnosed, how long it has been present, how it is managed, and what the medical records show about the period since diagnosis rather than a single moment in it.

Consistency carries real weight. A file that shows regular follow up with a physician, results recorded over time, and a pattern that has held is read differently from a file with a long gap and one recent measurement, even where the recent measurement is better. Underwriters are reading for stability, because stability is what predicts the next twenty years.

The rest of the file matters too, and often more than people expect. Blood pressure, weight, cholesterol, smoking, kidney and cardiovascular history, and any complication recorded in the file all sit in the same assessment. A combination is generally read as more than the sum of its parts, which is why two applications naming the same condition can be priced very differently.

None of this is a comment on how anybody should live. It is a description of what is in the file the insurer reads, and the reason for setting it out is so that an applicant is not surprised by questions that have a clear purpose.

Type, and age at diagnosis

The two types are underwritten differently because they present differently. Type 1 is generally diagnosed earlier in life and involves insulin from the outset, and applications are commonly rated, with the outcome depending heavily on the duration, the management and the rest of the file. Type 2 covers a wider range of situations and therefore a wider range of outcomes, including standard offers in favourable files.

Age at diagnosis works in a way that surprises people. A condition diagnosed at a young age generally carries a longer expected duration, and duration is part of what an underwriter is assessing, so a diagnosis at 30 and the same diagnosis at 60 are not read the same way at all.

Time since diagnosis cuts both ways. A very recent diagnosis sometimes leads an insurer to postpone rather than decline, because the file does not yet show a settled pattern. That is not a refusal. It is a request to apply again once there is something to read, and it is worth understanding as such rather than as a door closing.

The four possible answers

Standard. The application is issued at the insurer’s ordinary rates for that age and class. It happens, particularly in well documented files with no complications and no other significant risk factors.

Rated. The application is issued at a higher price reflecting the assessed risk. This is the most common outcome and it is the one people misread. A rating is a price, and coverage in force at a rated price does exactly what coverage is for. It also frequently comes with the possibility of reconsideration later.

Postponed. The insurer is not saying no; it is saying not yet, usually because the file is too recent, a change of treatment is in progress, or an investigation is under way. The correct response is to note the date and return to it, not to abandon the plan.

Declined. This insurer will not offer coverage on this file today. It is specific to that insurer and that moment, and it is not a statement that no coverage exists anywhere. Ask what the decline was based on, because the answer shapes every step that follows.

Why two insurers reach different answers

Each insurer sets its own underwriting rules, from its own claims experience, its own reinsurance arrangements and its own appetite for a given risk. On this condition the spread between companies is unusually wide, which means the same file can produce a decline at one company and a manageable rating at another in the same month.

That is the entire practical value of a broker on a file like this. Someone who submits these applications regularly knows which insurers currently read this condition more favourably, what supporting information each one wants, and how to present a file so the underwriter is not left guessing.

One caution matters more than any other. Applications leave a record, and shotgunning the same file to several companies at once is not a strategy, it is a way to accumulate declines. One well prepared application to a suitable insurer beats four hopeful ones.

If the answer is no, or the price is impossible

First, get the reason in writing and understand it, because a decline based on a specific finding is a different problem from a decline based on the overall picture. Then look at the alternatives in order, from the most coverage for the money to the least.

Group coverage through an employer generally involves no individual underwriting up to a stated amount, and it is the most overlooked answer in this whole subject. Association and professional group plans sometimes offer the same. Simplified issue coverage asks a limited set of health questions and issues on the answers, at a higher price for the coverage obtained. Guaranteed issue coverage asks none and generally limits what is payable in the first years for a death that is not accidental.

And where a term policy already exists, look at its conversion privilege before anything else. A conversion privilege typically allows a term policy to become permanent coverage without new evidence of health, within the terms and deadlines the contract sets, and it is the single most valuable thing an insurable person can hold and an uninsurable one can lose by letting a deadline pass.

A rating is not always permanent

Many insurers will look again at a rated policy where the file has changed materially, and the request is made by the policyowner rather than offered by the company. Whether reconsideration is available, when it can be requested, and what evidence it requires are set by each insurer, so the question belongs in the first conversation and not in a later one.

The practical step is administrative. Ask at the outset what a request would require, write the answer down with the policy documents, and put a reminder in a calendar at the interval the insurer names. Nobody at the insurance company is going to raise it, and a rating that could have been reviewed years ago is money that quietly left the household every month in the meantime.

Two things should never wait for that review. Coverage should be put in force now rather than deferred in the hope of a better answer later, because the risk being insured does not pause for the application to improve. And a conversion privilege on an existing term policy should be exercised or protected on the contract’s own timetable, whatever else is happening.

The evidence, and how long it takes to gather

An application on this condition is rarely decided from the form alone. Expect a paramedical visit at home or at work, fluids collected there, and in most files a request to your physician’s office for a report. That last item sets the timetable, and it is the commonest reason an application sits for weeks with nothing visible happening.

Some of that is in your control. Know the year of diagnosis, the current treatment and any recent change, the physicians who hold your records, and the date of your last follow up. Supplying that accurately shortens the process and guessing lengthens it, because any discrepancy with the records has to be investigated.

Ask about coverage during the wait. Many insurers provide temporary coverage from the day the application and the first payment are taken, subject to conditions printed on the form. It is not automatic and does not apply to every file. But somebody who goes uninsured for two months because nobody raised it has carried a risk that had nothing to do with the underwriting.

The one mistake that cannot be repaired

Everything asked is answered fully and accurately. The duty runs to the day the policy is issued, so a diagnosis, an investigation or a change of treatment before then is disclosed as well. Every other error in this subject can be corrected. This one is discovered at the claim, by the family, when nothing can be done.

It matters more here because this condition generates records. Prescriptions, laboratory results and specialist visits leave a trail an insurer can obtain with your authorisation, and a file that omits what they contain will not survive being read.

What follows from a misstatement depends on the province, the contract, and whether it was fraudulent. After a period fixed by the applicable legislation and stated in the contract, an insurer can no longer contest a policy for a misstatement that was not fraudulent, while fraud is treated without that limit. Any dispute about a particular policy is a matter for a lawyer.

Answer everything, keep a copy of what was submitted, and read the issued policy against your own answers, because a transcription error is fixable in the first weeks and expensive later.

Frequently Asked Questions

Continue Learning

Read The medical exam for what the insurer collects, If you have been declined for the routes that remain, and The conversion privilege for the option an existing term policy may already carry. Smoker rates covers the other factor that most often sits in the same file.