The Old Age Security Recovery Tax in a Large Disposition Year

The existing page on the recovery tax explains the rule, and the rule is not complicated. What it does not cover is the year that actually triggers it. For most households the recovery tax is not a permanent condition of retirement. It is an event, and the event has a cause: a cottage or a rental property sold, a corporation distributing a large dividend to wind something up, a locked in plan collapsed in one transaction, a business sold, or a death that triggers a deemed disposition of everything at once. Ordinary retirement income sat quietly below the line for a decade. One transaction puts a year of it far above the line, and a pension is reduced or removed for twelve months that begin long after the transaction is forgotten. This page is about that year: what puts income into it, when the consequence arrives, and what can still be arranged before, during and after.

How the recovery tax is computed

Part I.2 of the Income Tax Act imposes the tax. Section 180.2 charges a percentage fixed in the Act on the amount by which an individual’s adjusted income for the year exceeds a threshold. The threshold appears in the Act as a base amount that is indexed under section 117.1, so the figure that applies to a given year is published by the Canada Revenue Agency and by Service Canada. This page prints neither the percentage nor the threshold, because one is better read in the Act and the other changes every year.

Adjusted income is defined in section 180.2 as the individual’s income under Part I for the year, with only the specific adjustments the section lists. On a personal return it corresponds to net income before the social benefits repayment is deducted, which is why practitioners describe the recovery tax as sitting on net income before adjustments rather than on taxable income.

Two features of that definition do the damage in a disposition year. It is annual, so a single calendar year carries the whole consequence. And it is individual, so nothing about a spouse’s low income offsets it. Above a higher second threshold the entire pension for the period is recovered.

What a large transaction does to that figure

A capital gain is the usual cause. The taxable portion of the gain is included in income in the year of disposition, and it sits in adjusted income alongside the pension, the fund withdrawals and everything else. It makes no difference that the property was held for thirty years, that the gain is largely inflation, that the money was used to buy another property, or that the seller took back a note and has not been paid. The page on the capital gains inclusion rate deals with how much of the gain is included.

A dividend out of a private corporation is the second cause and behaves worse than its size suggests, because a taxable dividend is grossed up before it enters income. The dividend tax credit corrects for that in computing tax payable, but it does not reduce the income figure the recovery tax is measured against. An owner who takes one large distribution in the year the corporation is wound down can be pushed above the line by an amount well above what actually reached them.

A lump sum out of a registered plan is the third. A registered retirement savings plan or registered retirement income fund collapsed in one transaction, or a locked in plan unlocked and taken in cash where the rules allow, is fully included in income in the year of receipt. So is a lump sum from a pension plan that is not rolled over. None of these are capital gains and none of them get partial inclusion.

The two year lag, which is the part people miss

The recovery tax has a delay built into it. A return for a calendar year is filed the following spring, assessed some weeks later, and the resulting recovery tax is then withheld from the monthly pension over a twelve month recovery period that runs from July of that year to June of the year after.

So income earned in one calendar year reduces payments starting eighteen months later and finishing roughly two and a half years after the sale. The Canada Revenue Agency and Service Canada both describe the recovery period in those terms. A person who sells a property in the autumn feels nothing for a year and a half and then sees the pension fall in a year in which their income has already returned to normal.

The lag runs in the other direction too, and that is the part worth using. The reduced payments belong to the year after the income, so when the income has fallen back the reduction is being taken against a year that will not justify it. Left alone the excess comes back as a refund on the return for the year of the withholding, which is another year later still. The remedy for that is the next section.

Asking for the withholding to be reduced

The Canada Revenue Agency provides Form T1213(OAS), Request to Reduce Old Age Security Recovery Tax at Source. It is used by a person receiving Old Age Security who estimates that their income for the current year will be lower than the income of the year on which the recovery tax was calculated.

The form asks for an estimate of the current year’s income and supporting detail for the deductions relied on. The Canada Revenue Agency asks that it be sent before the recovery period begins, that returns for the previous three years be filed and assessed, and that any balance owing be paid. It is renewed for a further period where the circumstances continue.

This is the single most useful thing to know after a one off transaction. A household that sold a property in one year and returned to ordinary pension income in the next does not have to fund twelve months of reduced payments and wait for the refund. It has to file a form on time. The timing is what makes it work, so the form is prepared in the spring rather than after the first reduced payment arrives.

Spreading a disposition across tax years

Because adjusted income is measured on the calendar year, two smaller income years are frequently better than one large one. Where the transaction is under the seller’s control, moving part of it across 31 December is the plainest available tool. A portfolio holding sold in two tranches, one in December and one in January, produces two smaller gains in two different recovery periods.

The same logic applies to the withdrawal decisions that are entirely voluntary. A large registered withdrawal planned for a year that already contains a property sale can usually be moved, and often should be. So can a corporate distribution, where the owner controls when the corporation declares it and can take it over two fiscal periods.

The limits are real and should be said plainly. A single indivisible asset, a house or a private company, is normally sold once. A buyer sets the closing date as much as the seller does. And the tax result is only one input: nobody should hold a falling asset into a new calendar year to protect a pension. The point is to ask the question before the closing date is fixed, not after.

The reserve, where it is available

Where the proceeds of a sale are genuinely not all payable until after the end of the year, subparagraph 40(1)(a)(iii) of the Income Tax Act permits a reserve. The gain is then brought into income over more than one year rather than all at once, which is exactly what a person facing the recovery tax wants.

The Act limits it in two ways. The reserve must be a reasonable amount in respect of proceeds payable after the year end, so a sale paid in full on closing supports no reserve at all. And it is capped at one fifth of the gain multiplied by the number of years remaining, which means at least one fifth of the gain must be brought into income in each year and the maximum spread is four years after the year of disposition.

Subsection 40(1.1) widens it for a narrow class of property. On a disposition of qualified farm or fishing property, or shares of a small business corporation, to a child resident in Canada, one fifth is read as one tenth and four is read as nine, giving a ten year spread. The vendor take back note that makes a reserve possible is a commercial decision with credit risk attached to it, and the reserve should never be the reason for accepting one.

The order of operations with a spouse

The recovery tax is computed on each individual separately, so with two people the first question is not when to sell but who is selling. Where an asset is already owned by the spouse with the lower income and the smaller pension exposure, the disposition may cost the household nothing in recovery tax at all.

What cannot be done is to move the asset first. The attribution rules attach to a transfer between spouses, and a gift of an appreciated property to a spouse shortly before a sale generally results in the gain being attributed back to the transferor, which achieves nothing and adds a filing problem. Ownership that was arranged years earlier for its own reasons is a different matter from ownership rearranged in the weeks before a closing.

The second question is what else is on the two returns in the same year. If one spouse is going to be pushed above the line by a sale regardless, that is the year to think again about the pension income splitting election, about which spouse claims the family medical expenses, and about whether a discretionary registered withdrawal belongs on the other return. The pension splitting page sets out that election in full.

The dispositions nobody can time

Subsection 70(5) of the Income Tax Act deems a person to have disposed of their capital property immediately before death at fair market value. That produces, in a single final year, gains that were accumulated across a lifetime, and it is the largest disposition most people ever have. Subsection 128.1(4) does the same on ceasing to be resident in Canada.

A spousal rollover defers what passes to a surviving spouse or to a qualifying spousal trust, and a principal residence may be sheltered. What is left is realised in the year of death, in the hands of a person whose Old Age Security for that year is still being paid and will still be assessed. The pages on the deemed disposition at death and the principal residence exemption set out the mechanics.

The reason this section belongs in an article about planning is that the deemed disposition is the argument for realising gains deliberately, in years chosen for the purpose, rather than allowing the whole accumulation to land in one terminal year. Whether that trade is worth making depends on the size of the unrealised gain, the age and health of the owner and the whole estate, and it is a calculation for a qualified tax professional.

What not to do about it

Do not treat the recovery tax as a reason to keep an asset that should be sold. It reaches a portion of one benefit for one period. A concentrated position, a property that no longer suits the owner, or a corporation that should have been wound up years ago, all cost more over time than a year of reduced pension.

Do not assume the pension is gone permanently. The recovery tax attaches to a period and it is recalculated each year on the year before. When income returns to its normal level the payments return with it, and Form T1213(OAS) shortens the wait.

And do not decide any of this from a rule of thumb. The interaction of a large gain with the recovery tax, with the pension income splitting election, with age related credits, with instalment obligations and with provincial amounts is a projection, not a principle. Have it modelled on the actual figures, both returns at once, before the closing date is fixed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Continue Learning

Read the recovery tax on Old Age Security for the rule itself and the capital gains inclusion rate for how much of a gain reaches income in the first place. Minimum withdrawals from a registered retirement income fund covers the income that arrives every year whether or not it is wanted, and pension income splitting is the election that moves some of it. The deemed disposition at death is the disposition nobody schedules.