Super Visa insurance

Send this to a licensed advisor

No price appears on this page, and none is sent by email. What a contract costs depends on the person and the design, and no honest figure can be produced from three answers.

What the federal instructions actually require

• A paid policy, not a quotationThe instructions require the policy to be paid in full, or in instalments with a deposit, and say plainly that quotes are not accepted. It also has to be available for review by a border services officer on request.
• One year from the date of entry, and one hundred thousand dollarsThe policy has to be valid for at least one year from the date of entry and provide a minimum emergency coverage of one hundred thousand dollars, covering health care, hospitalization and repatriation. It must come from a Canadian insurer, or from a company outside Canada approved by the minister.
• A condition already diagnosed turns on a stability periodIt may be covered, excluded, or covered only once it has stayed stable for a period written into the contract before the coverage starts. The contract defines what stable means, and that definition is not the same from one insurer to the next.

What super visa insurance actually is

Super visa insurance is emergency medical coverage for a parent or grandparent visiting Canada, arranged so that it satisfies a requirement attached to the visa itself. It is not a special product invented by the insurance industry. It is ordinary visitor medical coverage, bought in a shape the immigration program will accept.

That distinction matters because it explains why the cheapest policy on a comparison screen is often useless here. A visitor policy sized to a six week stay covers the same kind of risk and does not meet the program, and an application supported by the wrong policy is an application with a defect in it. The coverage question and the immigration question are joined, which is unusual, and it is the reason families get this wrong.

The second thing to understand is what the coverage is for. A visitor to Canada has no provincial health coverage. A night in hospital, an ambulance, a scan, a surgery after a fall on ice: those are billed at rates set for people without a provincial card, and they are billed to the family. This coverage exists for that, and for nothing else.

It is not health insurance in the sense a resident means. It does not cover a routine visit, a prescription refill for a condition somebody already has, dental work, or a planned procedure. It covers an emergency that begins during the stay.

What the program requires, in its own words

As read from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada on 5 September 2026, the medical insurance for a super visa must provide a minimum emergency coverage of $100,000, must cover the applicant’s health care, hospitalization and repatriation, and must be valid for a minimum of one year from the date of entry.

It must also be paid. The department is explicit that a quote is not accepted: the policy has to be paid in full, or paid in instalments with a deposit. Families who plan to buy the coverage after the visa is approved have the order backwards, and that single misunderstanding causes more refusals in this program than any question of coverage quality.

The policy must come from a Canadian insurance company, or from an insurance company outside Canada that is approved by the Minister. Before 2022 only a Canadian insurer was accepted, which is why older advice found in a forum is not safe to rely on here.

For context on what the visa itself does: it allows a stay of five years at a time and provides multiple entries for a period of up to ten years, and the child or grandchild in Canada signs a letter of invitation promising financial support and must meet the minimum necessary income, which is tied to the low income cut offs published by Statistics Canada.

Source: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, the super visa pages on canada.ca and the Ministerial Instructions dated 31 March 2026, all read 5 September 2026. Requirements change. Confirm them on canada.ca before buying anything, and take questions about the application itself to a qualified immigration professional. Nothing on this page is immigration advice.

The clause that decides the claim, and it is not the amount

Families compare these policies on the amount and the price. Claims are decided on neither. They are decided on the pre existing condition clause, and a household that reads one clause before buying should read that one.

Every visitor medical policy limits what it will pay for a condition the person already had. The mechanism is a stability period: a defined number of days immediately before the coverage takes effect during which the condition must have been stable. If it was stable for the whole of that window, a sudden emergency arising from it is generally covered. If it was not, it is generally excluded.

Stable is defined in the contract, and the definition is exacting. It commonly means no new diagnosis, no new treatment, no new symptom, no hospitalization, and no change in medication. A change in medication includes a change in the dose. A parent whose blood pressure medication was adjusted six weeks before the flight may have a condition that is not stable within the meaning of the policy, even though the parent feels perfectly well and the doctor is pleased.

The length of the window differs between contracts, and so does the definition of stability, and so does the age at which the window gets longer. Those three differences are the whole of the comparison. A policy with a shorter window and a plainer definition can be worth more to a family than a larger coverage amount, because the amount only matters once the claim is admitted.

Two practical consequences follow. First, the medical history goes on the application accurately, including the medication that was adjusted, because a policy issued on an incomplete answer is a policy that may not pay when it matters. Second, the family reads the clause before the parent boards the plane, not after the ambulance.

What the coverage does, and what it will not do

What it generally does: emergency hospital and physician services, diagnostic work ordered in an emergency, an ambulance, prescription drugs dispensed in connection with an emergency for a limited supply, and repatriation, which means bringing the person home, or returning remains, in circumstances the contract sets out. Repatriation is one of the three things the program requires the policy to cover.

What it generally does not: routine or preventive care, a check up, ongoing management of a known condition, dental work beyond emergency relief of pain after an accident, eye examinations, physiotherapy outside an emergency, and anything planned. A person who comes to Canada intending to have a procedure done is outside the purpose of this coverage entirely.

Pregnancy and childbirth are their own subject and the exclusions around them are broad in most contracts. So is anything arising from alcohol or from an activity the contract lists as excluded. So, in many contracts, is a claim arising after a person has been told to return home and has not.

None of this is a criticism of the product. It is a travel emergency contract doing what a travel emergency contract does, and it is inexpensive relative to the risk precisely because it is bounded. The mistake is expecting it to behave like a health plan.

The amount, the deductible, and the honest way to choose them

The program sets a floor of $100,000 as read on 5 September 2026. A floor is not a recommendation. Whether a family carries more than the floor is a judgement about what a serious hospitalization in Canada costs somebody with no provincial coverage, and that number is larger than most families expect.

The deductible is the part the family pays before the policy pays. A higher deductible lowers the premium. It also means the family carries the first part of a real bill at the worst possible moment, so it should be an amount the household could produce that week without borrowing.

A word about how these are sold. The premium on a visitor policy rises sharply with age and with the answers on the medical questionnaire, which means two policies that look identical on a screen can differ enormously on what they will actually pay for a seventy eight year old with a managed condition. Comparing on price alone is comparing the one number the contract is least interested in.

One more practical point. The amount chosen is the amount that appears on the document filed with the application, so a family that decides later to carry more coverage is issuing a new document rather than editing an old one. Decide the amount once, with the hospital bill in mind rather than the premium, and file that.

The one year term, and what happens if the visa is refused

The policy must be valid for a minimum of one year from the date of entry. That is a longer commitment than most visitor coverage, and it raises three ordinary questions that should be answered before payment rather than after.

What happens if the visa is refused. Most insurers will refund a policy that has not started where the application was refused and the refusal letter is produced, and the terms differ between contracts, and some retain an administrative amount. This is a question to ask in writing before buying, not to assume. Our page on a refused super visa application goes through what happens next.

What happens if the parent returns home early. Many contracts allow a partial refund of the unused portion where no claim has been made, on conditions, and again the conditions differ. Where the coverage was a condition of the visa, cancelling it has consequences beyond the refund, which is a matter for an immigration professional and not for an insurance page.

What happens at the end of the year. The visa may allow a stay of five years at a time, and the insurance requirement is stated as a minimum of one year from entry. A family whose parent stays longer is making a fresh coverage decision each year, at an age one year older, with a health picture that may have changed. That is worth knowing at the start, because it is a recurring cost and not a single purchase.

Paying in full, or paying monthly

The department accepts a policy paid in full or paid in instalments with a deposit. Both routes exist because a year of coverage for an older parent is a real expense for a young family that is also sponsoring the visit.

Paid in full is simpler, is usually cheaper in total, and produces the cleanest document to file with the application. Paid monthly spreads the cost, and it introduces something to manage: a missed instalment can lapse the coverage, and coverage that lapses while the parent is in Canada is a problem on two fronts at once, the medical one and the immigration one.

Whichever route a family takes, the document that goes with the application has to show that the policy is paid rather than quoted, because the department says a quote is not accepted. Keep the proof of payment with the policy and file both.

Super visa insurance beside the coverage it gets confused with

Four things get called travel insurance in ordinary speech, and they do four different jobs for four different people.

The line that matters most for this page: a visitor policy and a super visa policy can be the same coverage from the same insurer, and only one of them is arranged to satisfy the program. Buying the first when the family needed the second is the most common and most expensive error here.

What this coverage is not

It is not life insurance. Some contracts include a small accidental death benefit or repatriation of remains, and neither of those is protection for a family. A household that believes it has insured a parent has insured a medical emergency during a trip, which is a different thing entirely.

It is not a substitute for a provincial plan, and it does not become one if the parent later becomes a permanent resident. That is a separate application with a separate waiting period in some provinces, and it is the point at which visitor coverage stops being the right instrument.

And it is not a financial plan. A family that is now responsible for an aging parent in Canada usually has larger questions in front of it than a year of emergency medical coverage: what happens if the parent needs care, what the household would do if the working adult in it could not work, and what is in place for the family itself. Those are the questions this practice exists for, and this coverage is the smallest of them.

The five mistakes this page exists to prevent

Filing a quote instead of a paid policy. The department says a quote is not accepted, and this is the error that costs families the most time.

Buying the cheapest visitor policy and assuming it satisfies the program. Coverage amount, term and included benefits all have to meet the requirement.

Answering the medical questions from memory rather than from the parent’s actual records. A medication adjusted a month before departure is the kind of detail that decides a claim.

Comparing policies on price and coverage amount while ignoring the stability period and the definition of stable, which is where the claim is actually decided.

Treating the purchase as done. The requirement runs a year at a time, the parent gets a year older, and the family should know at the start that this is a recurring decision.

Questions people ask

Other products

• Term life insurance
• Critical illness coverage
• Health and dental coverage
• Immediate financing arrangement