The Mortgage Renewal Wave, and the One Question It Raises About Protection
By Jose Salloum, Financial Security Advisor (Conseiller en sécurité financière) | September 2026
BIG DISCLAIMER, AND PLEASE READ IT. This article reports what the Bank of Canada published about mortgage renewals, read in September 2026. It is general education and it is not advice. This practice holds a life and health insurance licence: it is not a mortgage brokerage, it does not arrange mortgages, and nothing here is mortgage advice or a rate forecast. Questions about a particular mortgage belong with the lender or a licensed mortgage professional, and questions about the tax treatment of anything here belong with an accountant.
In plain language: this is general education, not a recommendation. What is right for you depends on circumstances we have not seen, and that is what a first conversation is for.
Key Takeaways
- The Bank of Canada expected about six in ten of all outstanding mortgages in Canada to renew across 2025 and 2026. Not six in ten of new mortgages. Six in ten of all of them.
- Of the mortgage holders renewing in those two years, about six in ten were expected to see their payment go up.
- The averages are smaller than the headlines suggest. Against December 2024 payments, the note projected an average increase of about a tenth for those renewing in 2025 and a little under that for 2026.
- The pain is concentrated rather than spread. Five year fixed rate borrowers renewing in 2026 faced the steepest average increase, roughly a fifth of the payment, and that group is about four in ten of all mortgages in the country.
- One group was expected to see payments fall: variable rate borrowers whose payment moves with the rate.
- A renewal is the one household obligation that resets on a date chosen years earlier by somebody else. That is what makes it the most predictable financial event most families will ever face.
- And it raises exactly one question that belongs in this office rather than at the lender: a payment that has just gone up is a fixed obligation that does not care whether the income behind it continues.
Most financial shocks arrive without warning. This one arrived with a date on it, printed years in advance in a document every borrower signed. The Bank of Canada put numbers on what it would do, and the numbers are both smaller and more uneven than the headlines suggested.
What the central bank actually published
The analysis is a staff note, it is free to read, and it is worth reading rather than reading about.
Its first finding is the scale. About six in ten of all outstanding mortgages in Canada were expected to renew in 2025 or 2026. That is not six in ten of some subset. It is most of the mortgage market arriving at a renewal inside twenty four months.
Its second finding is the direction. Of the holders renewing in those two years, about six in ten were expected to see their payment increase.
Its third finding is the size, and this is where the reporting and the note part company. Measured against payments as they stood in December 2024, the note projected an average increase of about a tenth for those renewing in 2025, and a smaller average for those renewing in 2026.
An average of about a tenth is a real increase and it is not a catastrophe. Anybody who told a household otherwise was not reading the note.
Who actually pays materially more
Averages hide the only thing a particular household cares about, which is whether it is in the group that got hit.
The note breaks it down by mortgage type, and the answer is sharp. Five year fixed rate borrowers renewing in 2026 faced the steepest increase, an average of roughly a fifth of the payment.
That is not a small corner of the market. Mortgages of that kind are about four in ten of all mortgages in Canada.
At the other end, variable rate borrowers whose payment moves with the rate were expected to see a decrease of several per cent, which the note describes as the most favourable renewal scenario among the types it studied.
So the same national event pushed one large group up by a fifth and pulled another group down. A household that only saw the headline learned nothing about its own position, and its own position is written in its own mortgage documents.
The useful question is therefore narrow and answerable. What kind of mortgage is it, and what month does it renew. Both answers are on paper the household already has.
The date is the part worth using
Here is what makes a renewal different from every other financial shock a family faces.
A job loss has no date. An illness has no date. A roof fails when it fails. A renewal has a date, and the date was known the day the term began.
Almost nobody uses it. The letter arrives, the household signs, and the new payment starts. The years between signing and renewing, which are the years when something could have been arranged, pass without the date being looked at once.
What can be done with the date is not this office’s business to advise on, because the mortgage itself is somebody else’s licence. What is this office’s business is the next section, and it is the part nobody raises at the lender’s desk.
The question that belongs in this office
A mortgage payment is a fixed obligation. It arrives every month, in the same amount, and it is indifferent to what is happening in the household.
A renewal that raises the payment raises that indifference. The obligation is now larger, and it is no more interested than before in whether the income behind it continues.
So the honest question after a renewal is not about the rate. It is this: if the income that pays this obligation stopped for a year, what would pay it instead.
There are only a few possible answers. Savings, for as long as they last. A spouse’s income, if there is one and if it stretches. Credit, which turns one problem into two. Or a contract that pays a monthly amount when a person cannot work, which is the answer this office is licensed to explain.
Nothing about that is a recommendation to buy anything. It is an observation that the size of the obligation and the size of the protection are two numbers a household can compare in ten minutes, and that a renewal is the moment they last matched.
The disability articles on this site explain what those contracts actually promise, including the waiting period, which is the feature that decides how long a household has to survive on its own before anything arrives.
A concept, not a recommendation
Everything below is an illustration written to show how a structure works. No person in it is real, no figure in it is a projection, and nothing in it is a recommendation to you or to anyone else. The numbers are round because they were chosen to make the arithmetic visible, not because they are typical, available or attainable.
What a contract would actually do depends on the insurer, the product, your age and health, the underwriting decision and the contract you sign. A recommendation can only follow an analysis of your needs conducted with you by a licensed representative. Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. is paid a commission by the issuing insurer when a policy is placed, and you should weigh anything here knowing that.
An illustration: the payment went up and nothing else moved
This illustration carries no figures and names no product, issuer or person. Nobody in it is real. Its subject is a pair of numbers, not an outcome.
Imagine a household that renewed a five year fixed mortgage and came out with a materially higher monthly payment. They adjusted. They cancelled some things and carried on, which is what most families do and it is not nothing.
What did not get adjusted was the protection. The amount that would arrive each month if one income stopped was set years earlier, against a payment that no longer exists.
Nobody made a mistake. There was no moment in the process where anybody was asked to look at those two numbers side by side, because the lender was arranging a mortgage and nobody else was in the room.
That is the whole illustration. Not a product and not a failure. A pair of numbers that used to match, and a date on which they stopped matching that everybody knew about in advance.
What the lender offers, and what to read in it
Most lenders offer their own protection alongside a mortgage, and this is the one place a comparison is worth making carefully rather than dismissively.
Two features decide the comparison and neither is the premium. Who owns the contract, and who receives the money.
A protection arranged through a lender generally pays the lender and reduces the debt. A contract owned by the household generally pays the household, or the beneficiary it named, and the household decides what the money does.
The second feature is whether the amount of protection follows the balance down. If it does, the protection shrinks as the debt shrinks while the premium does not always follow it.
Neither arrangement is wrong. They answer different questions, and a household that knows which question it is answering makes a better decision at the desk. What this article will not do is tell anybody which to take.
The cornerstone guide
Start here: the whole strategy in one page
What it is, how it works in Canada, what it costs, what it risks, how long it takes and who it does not suit.
Jose Salloum Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc.
Read the guideThe renewal after this one
This wave will pass, and another one is already dated.
Every household that renewed in this period signed a new term, and that term has an end date too. It is in the paperwork that arrived with the renewal, and it is the next known date in the household’s financial life.
A household that writes that date down, alongside the amount of the payment and the kind of mortgage, has built the thing this whole article is about: a short list of obligations with their reset dates on it.
That list is also the first of the four questions this site asks about money, and it is the reason the four questions page exists. A worry about renewals is really a question about who sets the terms, and that is a question a household can work on in the years between letters.
Where to read this at the source
The share of mortgages renewing, the share facing an increase, the average increases by year and the breakdown by mortgage type are all published by the Bank of Canada in a staff analytical note, free to read on its website.
Read on 24 September 2026. A projection is a projection: it was made on assumptions about rates that the note states openly, and it is not a forecast of any particular household’s payment. The only document that says what a given mortgage will cost is that mortgage’s own renewal notice.
Sources
- Bank of Canada, staff analytical note 2025-21, how will mortgage payments change at renewal, an updated analysis, bankofcanada.ca, read 24 September 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
How many Canadian mortgages were renewing?
The Bank of Canada expected about six in ten of all outstanding mortgages in Canada to renew in 2025 or 2026, and about six in ten of those renewals to carry a higher payment.
How much higher?
On average, measured against December 2024 payments, the note projected about a tenth higher for those renewing in 2025 and a smaller average for 2026. The averages are considerably smaller than most of the reporting suggested.
Who faced the biggest increase?
Five year fixed rate borrowers renewing in 2026, at an average of roughly a fifth of the payment. Mortgages of that kind are about four in ten of all mortgages in Canada. Variable rate borrowers whose payment moves with the rate were expected to see a decrease.
Can this practice help with my mortgage?
No. This practice holds a life and health insurance licence. It does not arrange mortgages and gives no mortgage advice. The mortgage belongs with the lender or a licensed mortgage professional.
Then what does a renewal have to do with insurance?
A higher payment is a larger fixed obligation, and a fixed obligation is indifferent to whether the income behind it continues. The question of what would pay it during a year without income is the part of a renewal that sits inside this licence.
A thirty-minute discovery meeting
A first conversation establishes whether this fits. No illustration is prepared and nothing is arranged.
Often the answer is no, and you will hear it during the call rather than in a proposal afterwards.
The form is on the discovery meeting page and takes a minute. It arranges a conversation. It is not advice, and nothing is being sold here.
Listen to this page
Read aloud by your own browser. Nothing is sent anywhere.
Important disclosures
This page is education, not advice. The content is general information prepared by Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. It does not take your circumstances into account and is not a recommendation to buy, hold or cancel any contract. CWCC is not registered with CIRO and does not provide securities advice. The firm places insurance in Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and New Brunswick; clients elsewhere are served by advisors licensed in their province.
Nothing here was written with your file in front of us. Read it to understand the subject, then judge it against your own situation, ideally with someone who is licensed where you live and who has seen your numbers.
This is not tax advice, and the tax treatment depends on your own circumstances. The tax treatment described depends on the contract remaining exempt under the Income Tax Regulations and on the reader’s individual circumstances. A withdrawal, a surrender or a policy loan may be a disposition under the Income Tax Act, and amounts above the adjusted cost basis may be taxable in the year they occur. Tax rules change. Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. is licensed in life and health insurance. It is not an accounting practice, it does not prepare returns, and nothing on this site is tax advice or an opinion on any reader’s tax position. Anything a reader intends to rely on should be confirmed with a professional accountant and against the current published rule of the Canada Revenue Agency and, in Quebec, Revenu Québec.
The tax result is not automatic and it is not unconditional. It rests on the contract staying within the Canadian rules and on your own situation. Before you rely on any of it, talk to an accountant who has actually worked with these contracts.
Illustrations and projections are not predictions. Any figures, examples or illustrated values are hypothetical, are shown to explain a mechanism, and are not a forecast of the performance of any contract. Actual values will differ and may be lower than those shown. Past dividend scales do not predict future scales.
An example is there to show how the parts move, not to tell you what you will get. Any real illustration you are shown should be read on its guaranteed columns first.